personal annotations
This commit is contained in:
parent
3dc9fe9ee9
commit
69796a0857
|
@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ Here are my notes from the various sessions under the [Chatham House Rule](https
|
|||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
#### How does InnerSource work at Paypal
|
||||
### How does InnerSource work at Paypal
|
||||
|
||||
* concept of a trusted [committer](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Committer) (TC) within core team
|
||||
* define a formal contributor document
|
||||
|
@ -62,12 +62,12 @@ Here are my notes from the various sessions under the [Chatham House Rule](https
|
|||
* developer does not have production access
|
||||
* legal information is isolated
|
||||
* production access nur ueber audited tool
|
||||
* [Holger]: Example for such an audting framework on AWS from Zalando: https://stups.io
|
||||
* *Example for such an audting framework on AWS from Zalando at <https://stups.io>*
|
||||
|
||||
#### Workshop
|
||||
### Workshop
|
||||
|
||||
* Existing model: variations of 'big cheese gets stuff done'
|
||||
* [Holger]: I could not find a good explanation for it, but the expression means that some inidvidual's idenity and self-worth are tied to 'being the one which get stuff done'.
|
||||
* *I could not find a good explanation for it, but the expression means that some inidvidual's idenity and self-worth are tied to 'being the one which get stuff done'.*
|
||||
* OSS Apache Model:
|
||||
* ratio of users/contributors/trusted committers/lead is 1000/100/10/1
|
||||
* How can we make trusted committer to not be the chokepoint
|
||||
|
@ -110,16 +110,16 @@ Here are my notes from the various sessions under the [Chatham House Rule](https
|
|||
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Open_Badges>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
#### Interviews and Lessons Learnt
|
||||
### Interviews and Lessons Learnt
|
||||
|
||||
##### Company 1
|
||||
#### Company 1
|
||||
* from central dev to separate dev per business units
|
||||
* resulting in a lot of redundancy over the years
|
||||
* challenge:
|
||||
* how can we speed up product development
|
||||
* AND keep the place interesting for engineers to join the company
|
||||
|
||||
##### Company 2
|
||||
#### Company 2
|
||||
* optimize developer productivity
|
||||
* low friction, high adaption
|
||||
* ease of use, ease of contribution
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue